By Paul Bishop
This quantity collects a wide-ranging set of essays interpreting Friedrich Nietzsche's engagement with antiquity in all its points. It investigates Nietzsche's response and reaction to the concept that of "classicism," with specific connection with his paintings on Greek tradition as a philologist in Basel and later as a thinker of modernity, and to his reception of German classicism in all his texts. The publication could be of curiosity to scholars of old historical past and classics, philosophy, comparative literature, and Germanistik. Taken jointly, those papers recommend that classicism is either a extra major, and a extra contested, suggestion for Nietzsche than is frequently learned, and it demonstrates the necessity for a go back to a detailed awareness to the intellectual-historical context when it comes to which Nietzsche observed himself working. An information of the wealthy number of educational backgrounds, methodologies, and strategies of examining evinced in those chapters is likely to be the single means for the modern student to come back to grips with what classicism intended for Nietzsche, and therefore what Nietzsche potential for us this present day. The booklet is split into 5 sections -- The Classical Greeks; Pre-Socratics and Pythagoreans, Cynics and Stoics; Nietzsche and the Platonic culture; Contestations; and German Classicism -- and constitutes the 1st significant examine of Nietzsche and the classical culture in 1 / 4 of a century. individuals: Jessica N. Berry, Benjamin Biebuyck, Danny Praet and Isabelle Vanden Poel, Paul Bishop, R. Bracht Branham, Thomas Brobjer, David Campbell, Alan Cardew, Roy Elveton, Christian Emden, Simon Gillham, John Hamilton, Mark Hammond, Albert Henrichs, Dirk t.D. Held, David F. Horkott, Dylan Jaggard, Fiona Jenkins, Anthony okay. Jensen, Laurence Lampert, Nicholas Martin, Thomas A. Meyer, Burkhard Meyer-Sickendiek, John S. Moore, Neville Morley, David N. McNeill, James I. Porter, Martin A. Ruehl, Herman Siemens, Barry Stocker, Friedrich Ulfers and Mark Daniel Cohen, and Peter Yates. Paul Bishop is William Jacks Chair of recent Languages on the collage of Glasgow.
Read Online or Download Nietzsche and Antiquity: His Reaction and Response to the Classical Tradition (Studies in German Literature Linguistics and Culture) PDF
Similar Ancient Greece books
From theatre to politics, no different unmarried civilisation has inspired the Western international extra profoundly than that of historical Greece. From the roots of democracy to philosophy and arithmetic, it’s attention-grabbing to benefit how a lot western civilisation has stemmed from that of historical Greece. This e-book deals an creation to the lives of the traditional Greeks, their mythologies and traditions and their tradition and studying.
4 seminal tragedies via the grasp Greek dramatist, in glowing new translationsOf the a couple of hundred performs Sophocles wrote over the process his lengthy existence, basically seven live on. This quantity collects 4 of them, all newly translated. Electra portrays the grief of a tender lady for her father, Agamemnon, who has been killed by way of her mother's lover.
Aeschylus (525-456 BC) introduced a brand new grandeur and epic sweep to the drama of classical Athens, elevating it to the prestige of excessive paintings. The Persians, the one Greek tragedy to house occasions from fresh Athenian heritage, depicts the ultimate defeat of Persia within the conflict of Salamis, throughout the eyes of the Persian courtroom of King Xerxes, turning into a sad lesson in tyranny.
The cradle of Western civilisation, old Greece used to be a land of contradictions and clash. Intensely quarrelsome and aggressive, the Greek city-states regularly proved unwilling and not able to unite. but, inspite of or perhaps due to this inner discord, no historic civilization proved so dynamic or efficient.
Extra resources for Nietzsche and Antiquity: His Reaction and Response to the Classical Tradition (Studies in German Literature Linguistics and Culture)
It is easy to in simple terms speculate at the purposes for the ongoing antipathy to the time period, that is finally a wonderfully stable Greek note. throughout the eighteenth and 19th centuries the observe polytheism used to be utilized predominantly to non-western religions, that have been thought of unconscionably primitive and heathen from a Christian 26 standpoint. due to its unfavorable connotations, the time period got here to be considered as tainted and hence irrelevant for the classical Greeks and their both classical gods. obvious during this context, genuine booklet titles comparable to “The religion of the Hellenes” (Der Glaube der Hellenen), “The Greeks and their Gods,” and “Greek faith” change into traditional euphemisms designed to mitigate a fact that Nietzsche faced with relentless missionary zeal. “FULL OF GODS” ♦ one hundred twenty five Nietzsche’s flirtation with the assumption of polytheism used to be probably the main captivating weapon in his own campaign opposed to the arbitrariness and vanity of monotheism in its Christian shape. as a result of the normal, certainly metaphorical, nature of a lot of Nietzsche’s argument, particular Greek gods are hardly pointed out. but Nietzsche had an intimate wisdom of Greek faith, either on an antiquarian and a conceptual point. He handled the antiquarian facets in lecture classes on Greek faith, to which we will go back. those lectures are systematic, informative, and real. With infrequent exceptions, they abstain from hypothesis, speculation, and conceptualization. the other holds actual for The beginning of Tragedy, Nietzsche’s so much conspicuous and such a lot arguable try and reinterpret and reconceptualize of the main well-liked Greek gods. released in 1872, it created an instantaneous stir. The e-book recovered from the consequent scandal and its aftermath, while Nietzsche’s acceptance as a classicist by no means did. The Polytheistic software of The start of Tragedy Undeniably a piece of genius, The delivery of Tragedy has critical defects while judged on its scholarly benefits. however it will be very unfair to carry it to one of these typical. it really is seen that The beginning of Tragedy used to be by no means meant as a piece of scholarship through its writer. It lacks all of the hallmarks of a scholarly ebook or article—it has no footnotes or references; the perspectives of alternative students are by no means mentioned; reviews of exceptional temerity are provided with out helping proof or argument; and misrepresentations bordering on planned falsehoods are universal. As is celebrated, only a few of the fundamental assumptions that underlie Nietzsche’s argument face up to scrutiny. it should volume to overkill to make Nietzsche once more the whipping boy of a slim historicist feedback. in its place, we will examine a unmarried factor, Nietzsche’s interpretation of Apollo and Dionysos, to illustrate of his inventive and conceptually daring appreciation of Greek polytheism. In retracing once more this crucial element of his argument, i'll concentration so far as attainable specialize in his optimistic contribution and forget about his errors. To be frank, i don't think that whatever Nietzsche says concerning the origins of tragedy, approximately Apollo and Dionysos as polar opposites and cultural icons, or concerning the id of the anguish Dionysos with the tragic hero, stands as much as scrutiny.